Well, the free energy is moving along - solar is free, and that's why TPTB fought it very hard for quite some time.  But things are advancing too rapidly to catch ALL the patents and buy them off.  Still, none of those offer flying cars, and so I am hoping We get electrogravitics off the ground (pun intended) - as in out of black projects.

Not sure what the X-Hawk is...  As far as the solution, add free energy, spend the funnymoney They are creating to push it out into industry, agriculture, transportation and homes.  This will take the cost of energy out of those things which will reduce the price.  This will reduce the cost of robots, which will allow Us to then focus on robots to replace all necessary jobs no One wants to do - We can spend more funnymoney.  Spend funnymoney on social services for those now unemployed by the replacement of Their jobs with robots.  The cost of things will drop more, and when all energy is replaced with free energy, and all jobs no One WANTS to do are replaced with robots, the costs will be nil, and the working People will be only those who WANT to do what They are doing, needing no money for needs and wants...  And money will be abandoned - the funnymoney spent will be irrelevant, regardless of how much was used.

In the process, the chaos seed (all societies are chaos systems with the infolded structure (seed) being the "laws," norms, and values) should be spread - as I describe in The End of Entropy.  The three Laws, the focus on organics and sustainability, stigmergic governance via the web, open-source programming of all public works, and a focus on following One's bliss.

With the removal of profit as motive, with the social benefits for good and pariahhood for bad behavior, We will work for BEST solutions, be motivated to contribute as We can to solve problems, and social "superconductance" will occur.  No One will HAVE to spend time with those They don't like.  No One will have bosses They dread but endure because They "need the job."

And Humans will be far happier.

Never angry.  I always take a lack of response to be tacit agreement...  [grin] And as for stubbornness, yes.  I want EVERYONE to have the freedom today's elite have.  Why should some be relegated to toil when Their bliss is not there?  Why should We use Human energy when We don't have to? Why should Some have privilage and Others not?  I will be VERY adamant in promoting a way for NONE of Us having to toil when We could build machines to do the toiling (not to say those whose BLISS it is to toil cannot; They are free to do so).

My grasp of electrogravitics is mostly theoretical and experiential through My father.  I promote it because I want to see flying cars and floating cities - like My dad said I would because of His work.  Any free energy will remove the need for money - but electrogravitics offers the gravity control.

And as robotics comes into its own, robots can do the fixing...  And the work no One WANTS to do.

This is where You're wrong.  First, My father was a CalTech graduate and was one of the top electrical engineers at one of the foremost aerospace companies in the 1950's.  He would come home and excitedly describe His work, and the successful experiments in electrogravitics, including gravity control ("antigravity") and overunity ("free energy").  He would paint for Me a picture of what My world would be like growing up because of His work:  cars would fly, cities would float, and We would have all the energy We could use.

One day He came home and told Me We could not talk about it anymore because, "They want it secret for now."

Second, the idea there is no free energy is promulgated by the elites who would lose control of Us if We had free energy.

Here's some links You may want to explore:

http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE24.html

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA227121
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0211/0211001.pdf
http://www.ssrsi.org/Onsite/PDFbin/Biefeld-Brown%20Effect.pdf
http://www.rqm.ch/Central%20Oscillator%20and%20SpaceQuantaMedium.pdf
http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/files/ElectrograviticsElectrokineticsValone.pdf
http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org/Loder.PDF
http://users.teilar.gr/~a.a.nass/files/C6.pdf
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/The%20Case%20for%20AntiGravity-booklet.pdf
http://www.ostfalia.de/export/sites/default/de/pws/turtur/NeuesVerzeichnis/Film_englisch.pdf

The "nature" of money is to track things?  Perhaps in very recent history, this is so, but the foundation (the basic nature) of money has everything to do with accounting for meaningful energy expended.  Here's a quote from eminent economist, Jeremy Rifkin, from His seminal book, Entropy:  "Money, after all, is nothing more than stored energy credits."  And if You peer into the CFR's publications, You will find They, too, state that money and energy are the same in base meaning.

Are You acquainted with the fact that 70-80% of the universe is comprized of what scientists call "dark" energy (also called zero point, orgone, radiant (Tesla), "vacuum," plenum energy - and other names as well)?  Effectively, this is an infinite source of energy and it exists EVERYWHERE.  Inside You.  Inside Me. and all points outside the both of Us.

On top of that, the scarcity on this planet is a manufactured illusion.  Statistically speaking, Humans don't exist on this planet:

1. If all Humans were given 1/4 acre of land in Australia (4% of land mass EXcluding Antarctica), a relatively low population density, there would still be a chunk of Australia left over - and the whole rest of the planet.
2. If You placed the volume of all humans into the Grand Canyon, You wouldn't even fill one side canyon.
3. If all of Us were placed into the state of Texas, there's be a fair chunk of Texas left over.

Because We are crowded into small spots on this planet, to connect to grids, it SEEMS like We are overpopulated.

Food:

1. Because We distribute by profit and not need, supermarkets throw out hundreds of thousands of TONS of food a MONTH.
2. Because We "fertilize" with nutrient-limited petro-"fertilizers" Our food supply does not supply proper nutrition.
3. Organic farming offers equal or better yield to perto-"fertilized" fields - and offer full nutrition
4. We pay corporate "farmers" to NOT grow food - to artificially hike prices in supply and demand

If We distributed by need, farmed organically, and used all farmland, We could feed 10 times the number of Humans presently on this planet.  Add new methods, such as vertical farming, and that could go as high as 100 times.

And as long as there is profit motive, the BEST solutions to problems will fall to the wayside in favor of the cheapest or most profitable (like paying fines instead of cleaning up polution...).

Not arguing at all. [smile]  You're debating, and I can appreciate that.

Surely We can leap into a new paradigm - in Our goals and understanding.  And all that We have to do to accomplish the abundance paradigm is:

1. Spread awareness of it to the tipping point which will...
2. Allow Us to demand the hidden tech which will...
3. Begin to remove the cost of energy in industry, agriculture, transportation, and homes, which will...
4. Drop prices to where robots for any necessary work no One WANTS to do will be affordable which will...
5. Release many from jobs They do not like - and We can support Them eaily though social services - which will...
6. See prices drop and drop and drop, until the effort to collect the penny for the week's groceries, the room full of furniture, the house, the [fill in the blank], is more effort than the penny is worth.

And at that point, money will not be needed.

When I speak of "money," I mean all forms:  barter, trade, shells, beads, coins, bills, checks, electronic funds, etc.  Such money was not invented to track, but to give credit for meaningful energy expended, as that energy was valued being as it was a scarce "commodity."  More energy could always be used.

This is wholely unnecessary.  This planet is vastly abundant, and with effectively infinite energy comes the ability to transmute any rare elements We might need.  And, in fact, We may be able to create matter from the aether.  

We would not need to track or charge for anything if We had abundant energy flowing to all of Us.  You are thinking inside the scarcity paradigm box, where accounting for the meaningful energy expended is a quasi-necessary thing.

Certainly, there is no going back.  In fact, having abundant energy and robots to do necessary work no One WANTS to do is terra incognita.  Society has never functioned under these options, and money would be a very outmoded tool.

Well, surely if that is the definition One chooses of "giving," then yeah.  But I envision Us all following Our bliss, and the "giving" will be in such forms as bliss in solving problems, bliss in programming things, bliss in building things, bliss in co-creating things with Others, bliss in creating art, bliss in teaching, bliss in cooking for others, bliss in researching, bliss in making movies, or acting, or playing an instrument, or singing...  If One wants to be a couch potato (few will actually make that choice when They can "afford" Their bliss), One is free to do so.  No drain on an abundant system.

Not sure how choosing to be a couch potato is "giving..."  But hey, if it is bliss, then Consciousness is receiving bliss - which the whole point of Consciousness is, in My view.

Let's do some figuring...

If You gave every Human, from just born to just hanging on 1/4 acre of land in Australia, You would still have a chunk of Australia left over.  Australia is 4% of land mass EXcluding Antarctica.  Now, most People live in families from 2-about 5 People.  So They would collectively have one 10 acre radius.  Add to that electrogravitics, which would allow Us to build houses that float, fly, even (along with offering overunity ("free energy")), and a third dimension opens up.

If One stipulates at the outset that no One can take over a place anOther is living in, fighting will be minimal.  The only reason You think People woud fight is because what gives most any given property its value is its views, and its access to energy.

With views available to all who choose to live in floating, flying houses, with energy local to the houshold, the beachfront property options open vastly.  As one example.

Given that You can take the volume of all Humans on this planet, putting it in the Grand Canyon, and You couldn't even fill one side canyon...  Given that You could stand all of Us in the state of Texas and have a fair sized chunk of Texas left over...  Given that this suggests that statistically speaking, Humans don't exist on this planet...

I think it would EASILY work.

The quality of things will increse, as planned obsolescence is eliminated, as no One is motivated by future sales/profit to make things that break...  Minimalism rather than consumerism will be the preference for most with no advertising for profit.

Or...  We don't HAVE to give anything because the abundant planet gives to Us without the mediation of money or a NEED to work.  See My thread, The End of Entropy, and My novella, written in a science "fiction" form, The Abundance Paradigm, available free here:

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/aad67f70b7b43ddc.pdf